![serial podcast episode 7 summary serial podcast episode 7 summary](https://i0.wp.com/www.hacktheprocess.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/alex-de-simone-on-hack-the-process-podcast.jpg)
![serial podcast episode 7 summary serial podcast episode 7 summary](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/b3/52/e3/b352e3f83f641d0f33c3d5e0e39a6d67--law-students-summary.jpg)
Obviously, a pocket dial during any specific assault is unlikely - but this shows, at least, that it is far from being a ludicrous possibility. That’s not a negligible amount, and supports the possibility that pocket dials are more likely to occur during an assault than at other times. If this statistic has any validity, then 5% of pocket dials to 911 occur during events that actually warrant police intervention. Of the 15 pocket dial calls received on August 22, there was one that alerted police to a domestic violence incident, which Hoell said is the most common silver lining in the technological advancement of cellphone emergency calls to the department. Though it only accounts for about five percent of what could be perceived as misdialed emergency calls, Hoell said there are instances when police respond to potential accidental call that turns out to be of legitimate concern. While I was unable to find any peer-reviewed data on butt dials during violent crimes, I did find one report, at least, that suggests unintentional cell phone calls are more likely to occur during a violent crime: They aren’t likely to occur, but they aren’t unicorns, either. However, misdials during violent assaults can and do occur with surprising frequency. The “butt dial theory” has been the subject of scorn because many people (including, initially, myself) think that such an event is just too hugely unlikely, too bizarrely coincidental, to be a legitimate explanation for the Nisha Call. Isn’t it stupidly unlikely that a pocket dial would occur during a murder?
![serial podcast episode 7 summary serial podcast episode 7 summary](https://discoverpods.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/true-crime-podcasts.png)
All I am arguing is that Hae was murdered at approximately 3:30 p.m., and whoever killed her was in possession of Adnan’s cell phone.ġ. I am not making any sort of claim as to who was responsible for Hae’s death, and there is no way to prove that with the evidence available. Note, however, that this is only an explanation for how Hae was killed. While there is (obviously) insufficient evidence to show this conclusively, I am reasonably comfortable in assuming that this is what happened, unless and until further evidence is made available to contradict it. The number of unknowns is so high that the existing record can easily support a dozen possible theories of how Hae was murdered, with no reliable way to distinguish which among them is most accurate.Īt least for this post, however, I’m going to stray a bit from the legal theme, and make a proposal for what I believe “really happened.” I think that the best interpretation of the currently available evidence is that Hae was murdered at approximately 3:30 p.m., and that the Nisha Call was a pocket dial that occurred during the killer’s assault. Moreover, for the most part, I don’t believe we can figure out what “really happened” - the state’s evidence was just too incomplete.
![serial podcast episode 7 summary serial podcast episode 7 summary](https://4english44.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/unknown.jpeg)
(Spoiler: It doesn’t.) From a legal perspective, that’s the more interesting question. A meditation on obsession and loss, I’ll Be Gone in the Dark chronicles the unrelenting path of a mysterious killer and the fierce determination of one woman to bring the case to light.In my previous posts on Serial, I’ve avoided writing about whether Adnan was responsible for Hae’s murder, and have focused instead on whether the state’s evidence showed that Adnan was responsible for Hae’s murder.
#Serial podcast episode 7 summary series#
The series is also a journey into the soul of McNamara, whose True Crime Diaries blog and years of relentless determination for justice for the victims helped keep the case alive and in the public eye, and who tragically died of an accidental overdose while writing her book. Drawing on extensive archival footage and police files as well as exclusive new interviews with detectives, survivors and family members of the killer, the series weaves together a picture of a complex and flawed investigation that challenged police for decades. A six-part documentary series based on the book of the same name, I’ll Be Gone in the Dark explores writer Michelle McNamara’s investigation into the dark world of the violent predator she dubbed "The Golden State Killer," the man who terrorized California in the 1970s and 80s and is responsible for 50 home-invasion rapes and 13 murders.ĭirected by Academy Award nominee and Emmy-winning director Liz Garbus (HBO’s Who Killed Garrett Phillips, Nothing Left Unsaid: Gloria Vanderbilt & Anderson Cooper) and produced by Elizabeth Wolff, Kate Barry, Myles Kane and Josh Koury, the series is a detective story told in McNamara’s own words, through exclusive original recordings and excerpts from her book read by actor Amy Ryan.